Water Stewardship Information Sources

Resource Name Forest and Range Evaluation Program Riparian Protocol - Why these indicators?
Unique File Number 176
Information Type monitoring
Surface Water
Aquatic Ecosystem A
Groundwater
Groundwater & Surface Water
Management for Natural & Industrial Hazards
Strengths Provides rationale for riparian and stream function indicators
Limitations
Challenges
Outstanding Research Questions
Outstanding Research Questions
Information Subtype riparian
Organization Forest & Range Evaluation Program
Resource Name Tschaplinski, P and Browne, K. 2010. Forest and range evaluation program riparian protocol - Why these indicators? FREP Extension Note #9, May 2010.
Resource Purpose There are 15 indicator questions used in the FREP Protocol for Evaluating the Condition of Streams and Riparian Management Areas (the FREP Riparian Protocol) to assess the functioning condition or ‘health’ of a stream reach. Stream reaches that are in properly functioning condition are not necessarily pristine streams that lack any kind of human or natural disturbance. Rather, they are streams that can withstand normal peak flood events without experiencing accelerated soil loss, channel movement or bank movement; can filter runoff; can store and safely release water; can maintain aquatic habitat connectivity within the stream network and between the stream and adjacent riparian area; can maintain an adequate root network or large woody debris supply; and can provide shade and reduce bank microclimate change.
Type of Information report
How does this help decision making?
Program Status ongoing
NE Coverage provincial
Drinking Water
Ecosystem Y
Fish Y
Groundwater
Public Safety
SW Quality
SW Quantity
Link http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/ftp/hfp/external/!publish/FREP/extension/FREP_Extension_Note_09.pdf
Text Query
Google Earth
iMap Path Link
Spatial Metadata
Map
Contact Email [email protected]